Affirming_the_consequent Non_sequitur_(logic)

any argument takes following form non sequitur

even if premise , conclusion true, conclusion not necessary consequence of premise. sort of non sequitur called affirming consequent.

an example of affirming consequent be:

while conclusion may true, not follow premise:

the truth of conclusion independent of truth of premise – non sequitur , since jackson might mammal without being human. might be, say, elephant.

affirming consequent same fallacy of undistributed middle, using propositions rather set membership.